The Court determined that (1) Appellant’s motion for a new trial complied with the provisions of NRS 176.515(3); and (2) that the district court abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct when it relied on the belief of the Juror who had withheld information during voir dire that she could remain impartial.
Mooso, Maegun, "Brioady v. State, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 41 (Jun. 29, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1056.