The Court declined to adopt the risk-utility analysis. The consumer-expectation test is the appropriate standard for strict products liability claims in Nevada, and the risk-utility analysis is inappropriate because it inserts aspects of negligence into the test and unfairly burdens plaintiffs.
Chronister, Jeff, "Ford Motor Co. v. Trejo, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 68 (Sept. 27, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1088.