The Court considered whether an objection to the admission of an entire set of documents as hearsay preserved the issue for appeal. Second, the Court considered what burden of proof should be used to rebut the parental-fault and child’s-best-interest presumptions found in NEV. REV. STAT. § 128.109. Finally, the Court considered if substantial evidence supported the decision to terminate parental rights and if the district court had considered all required factors.
Wiseman, Timothy A., "Summary of In re Parental Rights as to J.D.N., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 44" (2012). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 154.