Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
12-26-2013
Case Synopsis
The Court determined two issues: (1) whether an NRCP 59(e) motion to alter or amend may be properly directed at a post-judgment order or whether that rule is limited to final judgments; and (2) whether NRAP 4(a)(4) tolling applied to the appellants’ NRCP 59(e) motion.
Recommended Citation
Vitangeli, Allison, "Summary of Lytle v. Rosemere Estate Prop. Owners, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 98" (2013). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 28.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/28
COinS