The Court determined two issues: (1) whether an appeals officer’s conclusory order in a workers’ compensation matter failed to meet the statutory requirements of NRS 233B.125; and (2) whether the doctrines of claim and issue preclusion apply to require dismissal of a fourth request to reopen an industrial injury claim under NRS 616C.390.
Cutshall, Jennifer, "Summary of Elizondo v. Hood Mach., Inc., 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 84" (2013). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 43.