The Court determined two issues: (1) whether relief through a writ of mandamus was appropriate for the petitioners, Humphries and Rocha, and (2) whether Ferrell, a non-party cotortfeasor, was a necessary party under NRCP 19(a).
Daly, Sean, "Summary of Humphries v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 85" (2013). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 44.