Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
1-1-2005
Case Synopsis
The defendant appealed the Department of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV) revocation of his driver’s license because he believed the arresting officer was without reasonable grounds for ordering an evidentiary blood alcohol test.2 Defendant also challenged the reliability of the field sobriety test (“FST”) as administered and questioned whether the DMV revoked his privileges with proper authority.3
Recommended Citation
McDonald, Scott, "Summary of Wright v. Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 14" (2005). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 637.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/637