The Court determined two issues: 1) whether to extend the limited-duty rule established in Turner v. Mandalay Sports Entertainment, 124 Nev. 213, 220–21180 P.3d 1172, 1177 (2008), to the facts of this case, and 2) whether Palms breached the duty of reasonable care it owed to Rodriguez.
Bowman, Michael, "Summary of FCH1, LLC v. Rodriguez, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 46" (2014). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 787.