The Court determined three issues: 1) whether, despite there being sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction, the conviction may stand where the State engages in discriminatory jury selection; 2) how a convicted defendant may sufficiently demonstrate that it is more likely than not that the State engaged in purposeful discrimination; and 3) the responsibilities of the district court when ruling on a Batson objection.
Bernstein, Kelsey, "Summary of Conner v. State of Nevada, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 49" (2014). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 791.