Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date

7-16-2015

Case Synopsis

The Court held that the district court erred in deciding not to strike an empaneled juror whose background implied bias, but who promised he could remain impartial. Moreover, the Court held the district court erred in allowing challenges for cause while the juror was present, and by allowing newly discovered evidence to be entered into evidence on the final day of trial.

Publication Citation

131 Nev. Adv. Op. 50

Share

COinS