Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2016
Case Synopsis
The Court determined that (1) access and usage of historical cell phone connection data without a warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the “specific and articulable facts” standard is met, (2) the out-of-court and in-court identifications did not violate Taylor’s constitutional rights to due process of law, (3) the prosecutorial conduct during closing arguments did not violate Taylor’s Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial or Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, and (4) there was sufficient evidence at trial to support the jury's finding of guilt.
Recommended Citation
Kurshumova, Marta, "Taylor vs. State, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 27 (April. 21, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 957.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/957