This case involved the question of whether a counties’ approval of subdivision maps and street dedications which included a drainage system constituted inverse condemnation where the plaintiff’s property flooded as a result. The Supreme Court of Nevada adopted a six part element test for inverse condemnation, and determined that genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the County’s actions constituted substantial involvement in the drainage system sufficient to deem it public use.
Folkestad, Jessie, "Fritz v. Washoe County, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 57 (Aug. 4, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 994.