Before his interrogation, Tommy Laquade Stewart (“Stewart”) was given LVMPD’s Miranda warning pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona. Stewart then agreed to speak with detectives without an attorney. He was subsequently charged and convicted of kidnapping and robbery. On appeal, Stewart argued that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions and that the Miranda warning was legally insufficient. The Court disagreed and affirmed the district court’s judgment of conviction.
 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
Elias, Margarita, "Stewart v. State, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 20 (May 4, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1039.