Under NRS 41A.071, a plaintiff’s malpractice claim must be dismissed if the claim is not accompanied by an expert affidavit, but NRS 41A.100(1) states that the expert affidavit need not be submitted if the medical malpractice claim is argued under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. Because the appellant failed to prove that the instrument left in his body was the result of surgery, the claim was properly dismissed in that the claim did not satisfy the elements to permit the statutory exception of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. Likewise, NRS 41A.071 does not violate the Equal Protection or Due Process Clauses as applied to inmates or indigent people.
Chronister, Jeff, "Peck v. Zipf, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 108 (Dec. 28, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1118.