Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
5-24-2018
Case Synopsis
The Court held that a party waives the right challenge a juror’s presence on appeal when the argument is based on facts known during voir dire; the party consciously made the decision to not pursue, or abandoned, a challenge for cause; and the party accepted the juror’s presence on the jury. The Court then examined the issue of juror bias, and explained the differences between actual, implied, and inferable bias.
Recommended Citation
Schreiber, Sara, "Sayedzada v. State, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 38 (May 24, 2018)" (2018). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1153.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1153