In Nevada, no explicit definition has been adopted to define what constitutes a product for purposes of strict products liability. Rather, the considerations set forth by section 402A of the Second Restatement of Torts must be examined on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the policy objectives underlying the doctrine of strict products liability are served by classifying the subject object as a product. Accordingly, certain classes of objects—such as large commercial signs or custom-made objects—are not automatically precluded from the application of strict products liability where the party is engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing, and selling such objects.
Schobert, Ashley, "Schueler v. Ad Art, Inc., 136 Nev. Adv. Op. 52 (Jul. 30, 2020)" (2020). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1325.