Alexandra Mateo

Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date


Case Synopsis

The Court determined the lower court was correct in granting an ex-husband’s motion for summary judgment and quiet title. There was no genuine issue of material fact, however the Court held that the ex-husband was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. The Court concluded that the holding of Davidson v. Davidson did not apply to this case; thus, there was no statute of limitation issue, the divorce decree in controversy did not require renewal, and the initial action was barred by claim preclusion.