Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
3-4-2010
Case Synopsis
The Court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s equitable indemnity and contribution claims. Equitable indemnity and contribution claims are governed by statutes of limitation, separate from the statute applicable to the underlying tort. Accordingly, the Court reversed the grant of summary judgment and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
Recommended Citation
Phelps, Karlee, "Summary of Saylor v. Arcotta, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 9" (2010). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 328.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/328