The Court concluded that: (1) expert alternative causation testimony is permissible; (2) ex parte communication, even when improper, only warrants a new trial when prejudice is established; and, (3) an employee’s default may not be used against an employer codefendant contesting liability.
Paretti, Michael, "Summary of Leavitt v. Siems, 130 Adv. Nev. Op. 54" (2014). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 798.