The Court determined that (1) a casino’s knowledge of insufficient funds may negate the intent-to-defraud element under NRS 205.130; (2) there is no basis for a separate jury instruction; (3) the district court did not commit any additional errors; and (4) that NRS 205.130 is constitutional.
Goodwin, Leesa, "Summary of Zahavi v. State, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 7" (2015). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 850.