Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
3-5-2015
Case Synopsis
The Court determined that (1) the records of CCDC inmate calls were public records within LVMPD’s legal custody or control under the NPRA;[1] and (2) that Blackjack Bonding was the prevailing party and was therefore entitled to a statutorily mandated award attorney fees and costs,[2] regardless of their court-ordered responsibility to pay costs associated with production.
[1] See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 239.010 (2011).
[2] See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 239.011 (2011).
Recommended Citation
Gambee, Sydney, "Summary of LVMPD v. Blackjack Bonding, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 10" (2015). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 854.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/854