The Court determined, pursuant to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the Nevada Constitution, there was no taking of Ad America’s property because the Nevada Department of Transportation publicly disclosed its plan to comply with federal law, the City independently acquired property that was part of Project Neon, and the City rendered land use application decisions conditioned on coordination with the Nevada Department of Transportation for purposes of Project Neon.
Gandy, Jessica, "Summary of Nevada Department of Transportation v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 41 (June 25, 2015)" (2015). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 885.