Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
1-28-2016
Case Synopsis
The Court determined that a State Engineer did not improperly apply NRS § 533.3705(1) retroactively or constitute a retroactive application for two reasons: (1) the statute unambiguously applies to only approved applications; and (2) the applications at issue were approved almost five years after the statute took effect. Thus, the Court denied petitioner’s request for extraordinary writ attempting to bar the State Engineer from applying NRS § 533.3705(1) to the disputed water permit applications.
Recommended Citation
Warren, Mackenzie, "Corp. Bishop, LDS v. Seventh Jud. Dist. Ct., 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 6 (Jan. 28, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 942.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/942
COinS