Grupo Fasma v. The Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct. of the State of NV, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 29 (Apr. 21, 2016)

Authors

Kristen Matteoni, Nevada Law JournalFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-21-2016

Case Synopsis

Merely because service of process complies with the Hague Convention does not necessarily mean that it complies with constitutional Due Process. Here, the district court failed to conduct adequate fact-finding necessary to determine whether service of process complied with constitutional Due Process. Accordingly, the Court issued a writ of prohibition instructing the district court to vacate its order denying Grupo’s motion to quash so that an evidentiary hearing may be held on the matter.

Publication Citation

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Recommended Citation

Matteoni, Kristen, "Grupo Fasma v. The Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct. of the State of NV, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 29 (Apr. 21, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 951.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/951