The Court reviewed two consolidated appeals involving sentencing concerns, which stemmed from a district court judgment revoking probation and a district court judgment of conviction pursuant to a guilty plea. The Court dismissed the appeal of the probation revocation because appellant did not present any cogent arguments on that issue and because she had already been released from the nine-month sentence, rendering the appeal moot. As to the judgment of conviction, the Court affirmed. The Court held that a court may consider a defendant’s status as a pregnant drug addict in sentencing, especially if the status brought up by the defendant, as long as the sentence is also related to the defendant’s crimes. However, the Court made clear that this decision did not imply that a court should consider this status.
Orwoll, Andrea, "Newman v. State, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 31 (April 28, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 956.