The Court determined that (1) Nevada’s first-degree kidnapping statute NRS 200.310(1)'s "intent to keep" language is ambiguous; (2) NRS 200.310(1) requires proof that the accused intended to keep the minor for a protracted period of time or permanently; and (3) reversal is warranted because there is insufficient evidence to support appellant's first-degree kidnapping conviction under the proper legal standard.
Kaskla, Kristian, "Schofield v. State, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 26 (Apr. 21, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 958.