Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
9-14-2017
Recommended Citation
Kish, Steven, "O.P.H. of Las Vegas, Inc. v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 60 (Sept. 14, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1081.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1081
COinS
Comments
The Court determined that (1) NRS 687B.360 requires strict compliance such that an insurance company’s cancellation notice which fails to contain a statement of a policyholder’s right to request additional information is ineffective; and (2) an insurance broker does not assume a duty to monitor a client’s premium payments or alert the client when the policy is about to be canceled for nonpayment.