Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
2-25-2010
Case Synopsis
The Court clarifies and explains the procedure announced in Huneycutt v. Huneycutt 2 for seeking a remand to the district court to alter, vacate, or otherwise modify or change a district court order or judgment after an appeal to the Supreme Court has been perfected. Additionally, the Court explains that the perfection of the appeal does not toll the six-month period for seeking NRCP 60(b)(2) relief.
Recommended Citation
Sassi, Anthony R., "Summary of Foster v. Dingwall, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 5" (2010). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 330.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/330
COinS