This case involved a writ of prohibition to determine if Defendant’s double jeopardy rights were violated when the district court ordered a mistrial and subsequent retrial as a “manifest necessity” based on potential jury bias because defense counsel impermissibly argued facts not in evidence.
Kominsky, Amy, "Summary of Glover v. Dist. Court, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 53" (2009). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 346.