This opinion rejects International Game Technology’s (hereinafter “IGT”) challenge to the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Nevada False Claims Act’s anti-retaliation provisions (hereinafter “FCA”). The Court also clarifies the meaning of the statute at issue, NRS 357.250.
Gallagher, Krystal, "Summary of International Game Tech., Inc. v. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18" (2008). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 449.