The Court (1) affirmed the intentional tort and bad faith exceptions to discretionary-function immunity under NRS 41.032; (2) recognized the common law tort of publicity in a false light; (3) adopted the sliding-scale approach to proving a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress; (4) determined comity does not demand granting immunity from suit to foreign state government agencies if immunity would be available under that state’s laws, but not under Nevada law; and (5) determined comity does not require extending statutory caps to foreign state government agencies even if provided by law to Nevada government agencies.
Newman, Stacy; Odell, Jennifer; Orr, Jaymes; and Phippen, Patrick, "Summary of Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Hyatt, 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 71" (2014). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 823.