Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2016
Case Synopsis
The Supreme Court of Nevada held that the doctrine of mutual mistake is not grounds for rescission of a contract when the party bears the risk of mistake. The party bears the risk of mistake if the party is aware at the time of the formation of the contract that they only have limited knowledge of the facts to which the mistake relates, but treats that knowledge as sufficient, the court will allocate the risk of mistake to that party.
Recommended Citation
Ramey, Cassandra, "Anderson v. Sanchez 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 34 (Apr. 28 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 955.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/955