Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
Spring 4-7-2016
Case Synopsis
The Court considers an appeal from a district court order. The Court clarified that medical treatment is not the only expense on which a workers’ compensation claimant is permitted to exhaust his or her settlement funds. Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Recommended Citation
Hellman, Baylie, "Poremba v. S. Nev. Paving; and S&C Claims Servs., Inc. 132 Nev. Ad. Op. 24 (April 7, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 967.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/967
Included in
Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Workers' Compensation Law Commons