Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2026
Abstract
This Essay examines how developments in neuroscience (or brain science) affect our views of law, medicine, ethics, and religion. Part I shows how lack of clarity about brain death can lead to premature organ donation. Part II argues that health care too often provides inadequate brain care and incomplete rehabilitation. Part III explains why recovery may be possible for those braininjured patients who are told it is not. Part IV demonstrates how the fear of a brain-injured patient oddly affects my perspective on Tort and Criminal Law, which are being influenced by neuroscientific advances. Part V examines the new developments in neurotechnology that help and hinder the human aspects of our lives and that raise questions about our cognitive liberty. Part VI identifies the questions that brain science brings to religion. The more we learn about the brain, the more we question all aspects of our lives. Knowing more about the brain challenges what we have learned in the past.
Publication Citation
104 N.C. L. Rev. 1299 (2026).
Recommended Citation
Griffin, Leslie C., "Memoir: The Brain, Neuroethics, and Bioethics" (2026). Scholarly Works. 1561.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/1561
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Religion Law Commons, Torts Commons