Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
3-16-2017
Case Synopsis
An employer challenged the validity of Nevada’s Minimum Wage Amendment (MWA). The Court held that (1) the MWA is not preempted by the NLRA, (2) the MWA is not preempted by ERISA, and (3) the MWA is not unconstitutionally vague. The Court declined to address factual issues related to the employer’s wage calculations.
Recommended Citation
Campau, Sydney, "Western Cab Co. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 10, (Mar. 16, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1028.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1028
COinS