The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity that would invalidate the foreclosure sale; (2) pursuant to NRS 112.170(2), a regularly conducted, noncollusive foreclosure sale under NRS Chapter 116 is exempt under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA); and (3) inaccuracies in a foreclosure deed are not sufficient to invalidate a foreclosure sale that complied with NRS Chapter 116.
Turkeri, Yilmaz, "Wells Fargo, N.A. v. Radecki, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 74 (Sep. 13, 2018) (en banc)" (2018). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1191.