The Court determined that the trial judge’s actions during jury selection rose to the level of judicial misconduct in response to a prospective juror indicating she could not be unbiased. These actions could have impeded Azucena’s right to a fair trial with an impartial jury as the court feared that the potential jurors would not have been able to answer candidly about any biases they may have had.
Mallette, Mia, "Azucena v. State of Nevada, 135 Nev. Ad. Op. (Sep. 5, 2019)" (2019). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1256.