NuVeda challenged the district court’s decision to deny the motion to transfer the contempt hearing to another judge under NRS 22.030(3). NRS 22.030(3) is a peremptory challenge that allows accused contemnors the right to request a new judge if they request it in a timely and prompt manner. NuVeda requested a petition for writ of prohibition and mandamus. The Court found the district court did not err when they denied NuVeda's motion. The court emphasized that a party may waive its right to move for a new judge if they fail to make the request in a reasonably prompt manner. Therefore, the Court denied the petition.
Rogan, Alyssa, "NuVeda, LLC v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 137 Nev. Adv. Op. 54 (Sept. 23, 2021)." (2021). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1433.