The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether the district court erred in dismissing the appellants’ complaint on procedural grounds without granting leave to amend so that they could remedy any deficiencies in their pleadings thus far. The Court held that neither the appellants’ original complaint, first amended complaint, nor proposed second amended complaint, contained facts sufficient to show leave to amend would not be futile. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the complaint.
Mays, Candace, "Hung vs. Berhad, 138 Nev. Adv. Op. 50 (June 30, 2022)" (2022). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1515.