The Court considers an appeal from a district court summary judgment in a tort case concerning losses sustained due to unauthorized activity in a customer’s bank account. The Court reversed the grant of summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether respondent Bank of America acted reasonably in delivering bank statements, and also because the appellant’s suit was not time barred under a one year period of repose.
Newman, Stacy, "Summary of C. Nicholas Pereos, Ltd. v. Bank of America, N.A., 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 61553 (July 2, 2015)" (2015). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 889.