The Court, sitting en banc, determined that by failing to answer questions from the jury that suggested confusion on a significant element of the law, failing to give an accomplice-distrust instruction, and by not bifurcating the guilt phase from the gang enhancement phase the district court violated the defendant’s right to a fair trial.
Stacey, Chelsea, "Gonzalez v. State, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 99 (Dec. 31, 2015)" (2015). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 931.