Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
Spring 3-31-2016
Case Synopsis
The Court held that neither the United States Constitution nor the Nevada Constitution guarantees the right to a trial by jury in a termination of parental rights proceeding. The Court also concluded that the district court relied on substantial evidence in terminating appellant Jesus F.’s parental rights.
Recommended Citation
Diaz, Shannon, "In re Parental Rights as to M.F., 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 19 (Mar. 31, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 971.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/971