The Court considered an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to modify child custody and support. The Court held that the district court lost exclusive, continuing jurisdiction when the parents and child left Nevada. However, this did not end the jurisdictional analysis. The district court should have considered whether it retained jurisdiction under NRS 125.315(2) and NRS 125.305.
Martinez, Briana, "Kar v. Kar, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 63 (August 12, 2016)" (2016). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 996.