Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1997
Abstract
Hill v. Gateway, is but the most extreme example of a series of court decisions that allow large companies to impose potentially unfair binding arbitration agreements on unwitting consumers. The outcome in Gateway, however, is questionable on federal statutory, common law, and constitutional grounds.
Publication Citation
Fla. B. J., Nov. 1997, at 8.
Recommended Citation
Sternlight, Jean R., "Gateway Widens Doorway to Imposing Unfair Binding Arbitration on Consumers" (1997). Scholarly Works. 255.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/255
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons