Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2009
Abstract
During and since the 1976 Pound conference, the rise of nonlitigation approaches has sparked an intense debate as to whether negotiation, mediation, and arbitration are consistent with justice or rule of law, and whether litigation itself is sufficiently accessible to support a quest for justice. This article offers observations on questions related to this debate, including whether procedure matters, the limits of procedural reform, whether some processes are more just than others, and how procedural reforms enhance justice.
Publication Citation
19 Experience, no. 1, 2009 at 14.
Recommended Citation
Sternlight, Jean R., "Dispute Resolution and the Quest for Justice" (2009). Scholarly Works. 261.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/261