LaFrance on Employee Ownership of Federally-Funded Inventions
Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
2010
Abstract
In a case of first impression, the Federal Circuit held in Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems that a university engaging in federally funded research did not have legal title to its employee's invention when the employee had assigned his rights to a third party, even if that assignment conflicted with his pre-existing contractual obligation to assign his rights to the university. Mary LaFrance tackles this issue in this commentary.
Publication Citation
2010 Emerging Issues 4809.
Recommended Citation
LaFrance, Mary, "LaFrance on Employee Ownership of Federally-Funded Inventions" (2010). Scholarly Works. 455.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/455