New Horizon Kids Quest III, Inc., v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 409 (Apr. 6, 2017)

Authors

Andrew Clark, Nevada Law JournalFollow

Document Type

Case Summary

Publication Date

4-6-2017

Case Synopsis

Under the Nev. Rule of Professional Conduct 1.9(b), an attorney whose former firm represented a now adverse client, may be disqualified only when the attorney actually obtained confidential, adverse information while employed by the former firm.

Recommended Citation

Clark, Andrew, "New Horizon Kids Quest III, Inc., v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 409 (Apr. 6, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1029.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1029