The Court considers, as a matter of first impression, the standard of proof to be applied by district courts in resolving initial naming disputes of a child of married parents. The focus should be on the best interest of the child and neither parent should have the burden of proof. The Court held the district court determined the child’s name should be hyphenated to include both parent’s surnames and, in doing so, considered the best interests of the child and, thus, the order is affirmed.
Sullivan, Skyler, "Petit v. Adrianzen, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 15 (Apr. 13, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1030.