Document Type
Case Summary
Publication Date
12-7-2017
Case Synopsis
A court can use offenses committed as a juvenile, but charged and convicted as an adult, when it considers habitual criminal sentencing, especially if the offender’s past convictions are similar to the crime currently being considered for sentencing.
Recommended Citation
Fabbi, Joseph K., "Mullner v. State, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 98 (Dec. 7, 2017)" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1104.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1104