Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-28-2017
Case Synopsis
The Court clarified the definition of an indigent person and the demonstration of need sufficient required for an indigent person’s request for defense services. The Court additionally held that Widdis v. Second Judicial Dist. Court does not require an indigent defendant to request a sum certain before the consideration or granting of a motion for defense services at public expense.
Recommended Citation
Rocio Palafox, Ebeth, "Brown v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct, 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 113 (December 28, 2017" (2017). Nevada Supreme Court Summaries. 1122.
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nvscs/1122
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons